As a first year PhD student, it is not an uncommon thing to be asked to write a review paper on your subject area. It is both a great way to get acquainted with your research field and to get the background portion of your thesis completed early. However, it can seem like a daunting task to go from knowing almost nothing about your research field to producing something of interest for experts who have spent years studying your subject matter.
In my first year, I was exactly in this position and I found very little online to help guide this process. Thus, here is my reflective look at writing a review paper that will hopefully help someone else in the future.
A match made in heavenhell: academic writing with latex and git
Procrastinating writing by over-engineering my workflow
If you are like me, you can happily write code for hours and hours on end but as soon as you need to write a paper you end up staring at a blank page. Luckily, I have come up with a fool proof way to trick myself into thinking I am coding when in reality I am finalling getting around to writing up the work my supervisor has been wanting for the last month. Introducing Latex and git- this was my approach to draft a review paper recently and in this blopig post I will go through some of the ups and downs I had using these tools.
Disclaimer: I used ChatGPT to improve the writing style of this article, in combination with some personal curation before obtaining a final version.
You’ve probably heard it all already, from ChatGPT writing code and doing proofreading for you to a rap battle between OPIG’s Antibodies and Small Molecules groups, and more.
Whether you like it or not, ChaGPT has unleashed people’s creative side regarding applications and attempts to find shortcuts. Questionable? Absolutely!
In this BLOPIG post, I show how I used ChatGPT to easily write a post summarising some material of my own intellectual property, which I presented as part of my group meeting talk. Mainly, I list some personal thoughts on the ethical concerns around using ChatGPT to assist your writing.
To start off, I passed on content from my own publication draft to ChatGPT, asking to generate a blog post in plain English for BLOPIG. The outcome:
Not bad.
But, it made me realise a number of things:
With great power comes great responsibility [Uncle Ben – Spiderman]. You are responsible for the ethics that go into using ChatGPT. Are you faking expertise? Are you being actually lazy or just being efficient? Think twice (or many more times) if you’re doing the right thing.
It can significantly reduce the number of writing iterations but don’t take it at face value. Can you actually trust the plain output? No. Never take its output as the ground truth, as Large Language Models such as ChatGPT often produce biased writing outputs. Keep in mind that whatever you produce as a scientist will be picked up by others, and prone to drive misinformation, if incorrect. It is OK to reduce mechanical iterations, but it’s NOT OK to skip quality control.
Be open about it. You don’t want to set the wrong example for your colleagues. So, mention if you use it, how you used it, and it is fine to encourage efficiency, but not incentivising a culture of scientific misconduct and plagiarism. Don’t skip the step of producing quality ideas on your own. This is such a concern that publishers like Elsevier have already reacted by publishing guidelines contemplating this possibility. While Nature Springer is working on ways to spot AI-generated outputs.
The bottom line
What are the dos and don’ts of using ChatGPT?
Yes, use it to have fun. Yes, use it to proofread or polish your writing. Yes, use it to summarise your own ideas. No, don’t use it to do the analysis and interpretation of your results. No, don’t copy and paste its direct output into your publication. No, don’t hide that you used it. Finally, NO, you can’t add ChatGPT as a contributing author!
For my blog post, I thought I’d revisit my dark past on the other side of academic publishing when I worked as a copy editor and proofreader for two years between my undergrad and Masters. During this time, I worked primarily on review papers and news content. While I don’t claim to be a great writer or editor, I thought I’d share some easy tips to help refine your writing and make it more consistent. This is by no means an exhaustive list and probably most of them will already be familiar to you!
1. Consistency is key
I think two of the most important aspects of proofreading are ensuring consistency and using your common sense. For example, instead of agonizing over how you style a word, choose what you think is most appropriate and check that you’ve applied it consistently throughout the text. Check that style matches between the main text, headings, figure legends and footnotes. Some specific things to look for include the following:
Capitalization
If you’ve capitalized headings, has this been done throughout?
Italicization
E.g., have you italicized all your mentions of ‘in silico’?
Superscript and subscript
E.g., is ‘half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)‘ the same throughout?
Numbers
Have you mixed up numerical and spelled-out numbers?
E.g., I drank five cups of coffee and 4 cups of tea.
