Tag Archives: TCRs

Conference Summary: AIRR Community Meeting VII – Learnings and Perspectives

At the start of June, we (Lewis and Benjie) attended the AIRR Community meeting in beautiful and sunny Porto, Portugal. This meeting was focused on collecting and analysing adaptive immune receptor repertoires. This comprised of two rivalling factions at the conference: the antibody (Ab) people or the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) people. The split was nearly fifty-fifty between these two topics throughout the conference. Overall, the conference was a fairly comfortable size, with approximately a hundred people in attendance, making it easy to visit all of the posters and talk with many people in your area, without feeling too niche. There was a wide variety of content formats throughout the conference including posters, scientific talks, lightning talks, software demos, and hands-on tutorials. In the following section, we highlight some of our favourite sessions to give a flavour of what this meeting entails.

Continue reading →

TCRBuilder: Multi-state T-cell receptor structure prediction

Hello friends of OPIG,

From my last blopig blog post [link: https://www.blopig.com/blog/2019/10/comparative-analysis-of-the-cdr-loops-of-antigen-receptors/], I summarised our findings that TCR CDRs are more flexible than their antibody counterparts. Because of this observation, we believe that it is more appropriate to represent TCR binding sites using an ensemble of conformations.

Continue reading →

Do we need the constant regions of Antibodies and T-cell receptors in molecular simulations?

At this week’s journal club I presented my latest results on the effect of the constant regions of antibodies (ABs) and T-cell receptors (TCRs) on the dynamics of the overall system. Not including constant regions in such simulations is a commonly used simplification that is found throughout the literature. This is mainly due a massive saving in computational runtime as illustrated below: cutConstRegions

The constant regions contain about 210 residues but an additional speed up comes from the much smaller solvation box. If a cubic solvation box is used then the effect is even more severe:

waterbathBut the question is: “Is is OK to remove the constant regions of an AB or TCR and simulate without them?”.

Using replica simulations we found that simulations with and without constant regions lead to (on average) significantly different results. The detail of our analysis will soon be submitted to a scientific journal. The current working title is “Why constant regions are essential in antibody and T-cell receptor Molecular Dynamics simulations”.