Picture the following: the year is 1923, and it’s a sunny afternoon at a posh garden party in Cambridge. Among the polite chatter, one Muriel Bristol—a psychologist studying the mechanisms by which algae acquire nutrients—mentions she has a preference for tea poured over milk, as opposed to milk poured over tea. In a classic example of women not being able to express even the most insignificant preference without an opinionated man telling them they’re wrong, Ronald A. Fisher, a local statistician (later turned eugenicist who dismissed the notion of smoking cigarettes being dangerous as ‘propaganda’, mind you) decides to put her claim to the test with an experiment. Bristol is given eight cups of tea and asked to classify them as milk first or tea first. Luckily, she correctly identifies all eight of them, and gets to happily continue about her life (presumably until the next time she dares mention a similarly outrageous and consequential opinion like a preferred toothpaste brand or a favourite method for filing papers). Fisher, on the other hand, is incentivized to develop Fisher’s exact test, a statistical significance test used in the analysis of contingency tables.