How to estimate the inestimable

Back-of-the-envelope calculations are one of our chief tools as scientists. When you spend most of your time wondering if your latest measurement is correct, having a tool to check if the numbers make sense is simply priceless. If you are lucky, a good estimate might just avoid a costly or laborious measurement — this is very common in disciplines like chemical engineering, which a friend described as “the art of estimating numbers and plugging them into some variation of Bernoulli’s continuity equation”. Unsurprisingly, these Fermi problems are now common interview questions at major consultancy and tech companies, and have even started to go viral.

Last week, I thought I would ask my biochemistry students to solve a back-of-the-envelope problem as part of their tutorial work. Disguised as an enzyme catalysis problem, I asked them to estimate the energy of a single hydrogen bond. Needless to say, they were puzzled. Some of them asked if I had forgotten to include some information in the problem sheet. For some reason, Fermi problems seem to be less common in chemistry and biology that they are in physics of engineering. Of course, estimating the energy of a hydrogen bond is in many ways much harder than guessing the number of ping pong balls that fit a Boeing 747. Nobody has seen a hydrogen bond in the flesh. And our minds struggle to grasp the vast numbers present at the molecular level. Nevertheless, guesstimates are incredibly useful

Continue reading →

Post-processing for molecular docking: Assigning the correct bond order using RDKit.

AutoDock4 and AutoDock Vina are the most commonly used open-source software for protein-ligand docking. However, they both rely on a derivative of the “PDB” (Protein Data Base) file format: the “PDBQT” file (Protein Data Bank, Partial Charge (Q), & Atom Type (T)). In addition to the information contained in normal PDB files, PDBQT files have an additional column that lists the partial charge (Q) and the assigned AutoDock atom type (T) for each atom in the molecule. AutoDock atom types offer a more granular differentiation between atoms such as listing aliphatic carbons and aromatic carbons as separate AutoDock atom types.

The biggest drawback about the PDBQT format is that it does not encode for the bond order in molecules explicitly. Instead, the bond order is inferred based on the atom type, distance and angle to nearby atoms in the molecule. For normal sp3 carbons and molecules with mostly single bonds this system works fine, however, for more complex structures containing for example aromatic rings, conjugated systems and hypervalent atoms such as sulphur, the bond order is often not displayed correctly. This leads to issues downstream in the screening pipeline when molecules suddenly change their bond order or have to be discarded after docking because of impossible bond orders.

The solution to this problem is included in RDKit: The AssignBondOrdersFromTemplate function. All you need to do is load the original molecule used for docking as a template molecule and the docked pose PDBQT file into RDKIT as a PDB, without the bond order information. Then assign the original bond order from your template molecule. The following code snippet covers the necessary functions and should help you build a more accurate and reproducible protein-ligand docking pipeline:

#import RDKit AllChem
from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem


#load original molecule from smiles
SMILES_STRING = "CCCCCCCCC" #the smiles string of your ligand
template = Chem.MolFromSmiles(SMILES_STRING)

#load the docked pose as a PDB file
loc_of_docked_pose = "docked_pose_mol.pdb" #file location of the docked pose converted to PDB file
docked_pose = AllChem.MolFromPDBFile(loc_of_docked_pose)

#Assign the bond order to force correct valence
newMol = AllChem.AssignBondOrdersFromTemplate(template, docked_pose)

#Add Hydrogens if desired. "addCoords = True" makes sure the hydrogens are added in 3D. This does not take pH/pKa into account. 
newMol_H = Chem.AddHs(newMol, addCoords=True)

#save your new correct molecule as a sdf file that encodes for bond orders correctly
output_loc = "docked_pose_assigned_bond_order.sdf" #output file name
Chem.MolToMolFile(newMol_H, output_loc)

Non-linear Dependence? Mutual Information to the Rescue!

We are all familiar with the idea of a correlation. In the broadest sense of the word, a correlation can refer to any kind of dependence between two variables. There are three widely used tests for correlation:

  • Spearman’s r: Used to measure a linear relationship between two variables. Requires linear dependence and each marginal distribution to be normal.
  • Pearson’s ρ: Used to measure rank correlations. Requires the dependence structure to be described by a monotonic relationship
  • Kendall’s 𝛕: Used to measure ordinal association between variables.

While these three measures give us plenty of options to work with, they do not work in all cases. Take for example the following variables, Y1 and Y2. These might be two variables that vary in a concerted manner.

Perhaps we suspect that a state change in Y1 leads to a state change in Y2 or vice versa and we want to measure the association between these variables. Using the three measures of correlation, we get the following results:

Continue reading →

Fragment Based Drug Discovery with Crystallographic Fragment Screening at XChem and Beyond

Disclaimer: I’m a current PhD student working on PanDDA 2 for Frank von Delft and Charlotte Deane, and sponsored by Global Phasing, and some of this is my opinion – if it isn’t obvious in one of the references I probably said it so take it with a pinch of salt

Fragment Based Drug Discovery

Principle

Fragment based drugs discovery (FBDD) is a technique for finding lead compounds for medicinal chemistry. In FBDD a protein target of interest is identified for inhibition and a small library, typically of a few hundred compounds, is screened against it. Though these typically bind weakly, they can be used as a starting point for chemical elaboration towards something more lead-like. This approach is primarily contrasted with high throughput screening (HTS), in which an enormous number of larger, more complex molecules are screened in order to find ones which bind. The key idea is recognizing that the molecules in these HTS libraries can typically be broken down into a much smaller number of common substructures, fragments, so screening these ought to be more informative: between them they describe more of the “chemical space” which interacts with the protein. Since it first appeared about 25 years ago, FBDD has delivered four drugs for clinical use and over 40 molecules to clinical trials.

Continue reading →

How to Blopig

Blopig has a wealth of knowledge, with everything from a Bayesian answer to the question “should ketchup be stored in the fridge?“* to the Nobel-Prize-Winner-approved analysis of AlphaFold2. Blopig runs on WordPress and uses blocks, components for adding different types of content to a post. These are blocks like paragraphs, headers, images, image galleries, and videos. Here are some hints and tips for getting the most out of WordPress.

One of the first blocks worth mentioning is the “Read More…” block…

Continue reading →

How to turn a SMILES string into a molecular graph for Pytorch Geometric

Despite some of their technical issues, graph neural networks (GNNs) are quickly being adopted as one of the state-of-the-art methods for molecular property prediction. The differentiable extraction of molecular features from low-level molecular graphs has become a viable (although not always superior) alternative to classical molecular representation techniques such as Morgan fingerprints and molecular descriptor vectors.

But molecular data usually comes in the sequential form of labeled SMILES strings. It is not obvious for beginners how to optimally transform a SMILES string into a structured molecular graph object that can be used as an input for a GNN. In this post, we show how to convert a SMILES string into a molecular graph object which can subsequently be used for graph-based machine learning. We do so within the framework of Pytorch Geometric which currently is one of the best and most commonly used Python-based GNN-libraries.

We divide our task into three high-level steps:

  1. We define a function that maps an RDKit atom object to a suitable atom feature vector.
  2. We define a function that maps an RDKit bond object to a suitable bond feature vector.
  3. We define a function that takes as its input a list of SMILES strings and associated labels and then uses the functions from 1.) and 2.) to create a list of labeled Pytorch Geometric graph objects as its output.
Continue reading →

NeurIPS 2021 Conference Feedback

Held annually in December, the Neural Information Processing Systems meetings aim to encourage researchers using machine learning techniques in their work – whether it be in economics, physics, or any number of fields – to get together to discuss their findings, hear from world-leading experts, and in many years past, ski. The virtual nature of this year’s conference had an enormously negative impact on attendees’ skiing experiences, but it nevertheless was a pleasure to attend – the machine learning in structural biology workshop, in particular, provided a useful overview of the hottest topics in the field, and of the methods that people are using to tackle them. 

This year’s NeurIPS highlighted the growing interest in applying the newest Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms on proteins. This includes antibodies, as seen by two presentations in the MLSB workshop, which focused on using these algorithms for the discovery and design of antibodies. Ruffolo et al. presented their version of a BERT-inspired language model for antibodies. The purpose of such a model is to create representations that encapsulate all information of an antibody sequence, which can then be used to predict antibody properties. In their work, they showed how the representations could be used to predict high-redundancy sequences (a proxy for strong binders) and how continuous trajectories consistent with the number of mutations could be observed when using umap on the representations. While such representations can be used to predict properties of antibodies, another work by Shuai et al. instead focused on training a generative language model for antibodies, able to generate a region in an antibody based on the rest of the antibody. This can then potentially be used to generate new viable CDR regions of variable length, better than randomly mutating them.

Continue reading →

Python’s Data Classes

When writing code, you have inevitably needed to store data throughout your pipeline. In these cases you store your value, list or data frame as a variable to easily use it elsewhere in your code. However, sometimes your data has an awkward form, consisting of a number of different length lists or data of different types and sizes. While it is still doable to work with, and using tuples or dictionaries can help, accessing different elements in your data quickly becomes messy and it is less intuitive what your code is actually doing.

To solve the above stated problem, data classes were introduced as a new feature in Python 3.7. A data class is a regular Python class, but with certain methods already implemented for you. This makes them easy to create and removes a lot of boilerplate (repeated code) making them simpler, more intuitive and pretty. Further, as data classes are part of the standard library, you can directly import it without needing to install any external dependencies (noice).

With the sales pitch out of the way, let us look at how we can use data classes. 

from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any

@dataclass
class Antibody:
    vgene: str
    jgene: None
    sequence: Any = 'EVQ'
Continue reading →

A quantitative way to measure targeted protein degradation

Whenever we order consumables in the Chemistry department, the whole lab gets an email notification once they arrive. So I can understand why I got some puzzled reactions from my colleagues when one such email arrived saying that my ‘artichoke’ was ready to collect from stores. Had I been sneakily doing my grocery shopping on a university research budget?

Artichoke is, in fact, the name of a plasmid designed by the Ebert lab (https://www.addgene.org/73320/), which I have been using in some of my research on targeted protein degradation. The premise is simple enough: genes for two different fluorescent proteins, one of which is fused to a protein-of-interest.

Continue reading →