Category Archives: Small Molecules

de novo Small Molecule Design using Deep Learning

This is an interesting paper by Zhavoronkov, et al. that recently got published in Nature Biotechnology as a brief communication: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-019-0224-x. The paper describes a new deep generative model called generative tensorial reinforcement learning (GENTRL), which enables optimization for synthetic feasibility, novelty, and biological activity. In this work, authors have deigned, synthesized, and experimentally validated molecules targeting discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) in less than two months. The code for GENTRL is available here: https://github.com/insilicomedicine/gentrl.

Reference: Zhavoronkov, A. et al. Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors. Nature Biotechnology 2019, 37, 1038-1040.

What are Hotspots in Structural Biology?

“Hotspot” is one of those extremely versatile words, similar to “model” and “buffer”, which can mean a variety of things depending on context. According to Merriam-Webster, a hotspot is “a place of more than usual interest, activity, or popularity”. This is the most general definition of the concept I could find in a quick search, and the one I find closest in spirit to the way hotspots are perceived in a structural biology context. What this blog post is definitely not about are hotspots as “areas of political, military, or civil unrest” (my experience with them has so far been mostly peaceful), or anything to do with geology, WiFi connections, or forest fires.
However, even within the context of structural biology and structure-based drug design, the word “hotspot” has multiple meanings. In this blog post, I will try to summarise the main ones I have come across, the (sometimes subtle) differences between them, and provide a few useful papers to serve as an entry point for interested readers. Continue reading →

NeurIPS 2019: Chemistry/Biology papers

NeurIPS is the largest machine learning conference (by number of participants), with over 8,000 in 2017. This year, the conference will be held in Vancouver, Canada from 8th-14th December.

Recently, the list of accepted papers was announced, with 1430 papers accepted. Here, I will highlight several of potential interest to the chem-/bio-informatics communities. Given the large number of papers, these were selected either by “accident” (i.e. I stumbled across them in one way or another) or through a basic search (e.g. Ctrl+f “molecule”).

Continue reading →

A new way of eating too much

Fresh off the pages of Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism comes a warning no self-respecting sweet tooth should ignore.

“Liquorice is not just a candy,” write a team of ten from Chicago. “Life-threatening complications can occur with excess use.” Hold on to your teabags. Liquorice – the Marmite of sweets – is about to become a lot more sinister.

Continue reading →

When OPIGlets leave the office

Hi everyone,

My blogpost this time around is a list of conferences popular with OPIGlets. You are highly likely to see at least one of us attending or presenting at these meetings! I’ve tried to make it as exhaustive as possible (with thanks to Fergus Imrie!), listing conferences in upcoming chronological order.

(Most descriptions are slightly modified snippets taken from the official websites.)

Continue reading →

Alchemistry Free Energy Workshop 2019, Göttingen

I thought I would use this blog to summarise the recent Alchemistry Free Energy workshop in Göttingen, Germany. This event, organised by MPI BPC and BioExcel, brought together academics and industrialists who work with alchemical MM methods to calculate free energies. This was a very successful successor to a similar event organised two year ago in London and now looks to be repeated yearly, alternating between Europe and Boston.

Continue reading →

Graph-based Methods for Cheminformatics

In cheminformatics, there are many possible ways to encode chemical data represented by small molecules and proteins, such as SMILES, fingerprints, chemical descriptors etc. Recently, utilising graph-based methods for machine learning have become more prominent. In this post, we will explore why representing molecules as graphs is a natural and suitable encoding. Continue reading →

Check My Blob

A brief overview and discussion of: Automatic recognition of ligands in electron density by machine learning .This paper aims to reduce the bias of crystallographers fitting ligands into electron density for protein ligand complexes. The authors train a supervised machine learning model using known ligand sites across the whole protein databank, to produce a classifier that can identify which common ligands could fit to that electron density.

Continue reading →