Category Archives: Protein Structure

Curious About the Origins of Computerized Molecules? Free Webinar Dec 22…

After the stunning announcement at CASP14 that DeepMind’s AlphaFold 2 had successfully predicted the structures of proteins from their sequence alone, it’s hard to believe we began this journey by representing molecules with punched cards…

Image of a punched card, showing 80 columns and 12 rows, with particular rectangular holes representing the 1 bits of binary numbers. The upper right corner is cut at an angle, to facilitate feeding the card into a punched card reader. The column numbers are printed along the bottom. The words “IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED” are printed along the very bottom. This card is line 12 from a Fortran program, “12 PIFRA=(A(JB,37)-A(JB,99))/A(JB,47) PUX 0430”. Image Credit: Pete Birkinshaw, Manchester, U.K. CC BY 2.0

Tales of carrying stacks of punched cards to the computer centre with a line drawn diagonally on the side of the stack, to help put them back in order should you trip and fall—seem like another universe—but this is what passed for the human-computer interface in much of the mid-20th century.

Continue reading →

CASP14: what Google DeepMind’s AlphaFold 2 really achieved, and what it means for protein folding, biology and bioinformatics

Disclaimer: this post is an opinion piece based on the experience and opinions derived from attending the CASP14 conference as a doctoral student researching protein modelling. When provided, quotes have been extracted from my notes of the event, and while I hope to have captured them as accurately as possible, I cannot guarantee that they are a word-by-word facsimile of what the individuals said. Neither the Oxford Protein Informatics Group nor I accept any responsibility for the content of this post.

You might have heard it from the scientific or regular press, perhaps even from DeepMind’s own blog. Google ‘s AlphaFold 2 indisputably won the 14th Critical Assessment of Structural Prediction competition, a biannual blind test where computational biologists try to predict the structure of several proteins whose structure has been determined experimentally — yet not publicly released. Their results are so incredibly accurate that many have hailed this code as the solution to the long-standing protein structure prediction problem.

Continue reading →

PyMOL: colour by residue

PyMOL is a handy free way of viewing three dimensional protein structures. It allows you to toggle between different representations of the protein – such as cartoon, surface, sticks, etc. – which all have their own pros and cons.

However one thing I felt that PyMOL lacked was an easy way to visually distinguish residues based on type. Whist you can easily differentiate atom types based on colour in the colour menu, and even choose which colour you wish carbons to show up as whilst keeping heteroatoms different colours, this assigned carbon colour would be constant throughout the entire protein.

Continue reading →

Speaking about Sequence and Structure at a Summit

A couple of weeks ago I was lucky enough to be asked to speak at the 5th Computational Drug Discovery & Development for Biologics Summit. This was my first virtual conference – it was a shame I didn’t get to visit Boston, and presenting to my empty room was slightly bizarre, but it was great to hear what people have been working on, and there’s definitely something to be said for attending a conference in fluffy socks…

A, antibody structure. An antibody is made up of four chains: two light (orange) and two heavy (blue). Each chain is made up of a series of domains—the variable domains of the light and heavy chains together are known as the Fv region (shown on the right; PDB entry 12E8). The Fv features six loops known as complementarity determining regions or CDRs (shown in dark blue); these are mainly responsible for antigen binding. B, example sequences for the VH and VL, highlighting the CDR regions and the genetic composition. It is estimated that the human antibody repertoire contains up to 1013 unique sequences, enabling the immune system to respond to almost any antigen. This is possible through the recombination of V, D and J gene segments, junctional diversification, and somatic hypermutation.
Continue reading →

Constrained docking for bump and hole methodology

Selectivity is an important trait to consider when designing small molecule probes for chemical biology. If you wish to use a small molecule to study a particular protein, but that small molecule is fairly promiscuous in its binding habits, there are risks that any effects you observe may be due to it binding other proteins with similarly shaped binding pockets, instead of your protein of interest.

Continue reading →

It’s been here all along: Analysis of the antibody DE loop

In my work, I mainly look at antigen-bound antibodies and this means a lot of analysing interfaces. Specifically, I spend a lot of my time examining the contributions of complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) to antigen binding, but what about antibodies where the framework (FW) region also contributes to binding? Such structures do exist, and these interactions are rarely trivial. As such, a recent preprint I came across where the authors examined the DE loops of antibodies was a great motivator to broaden my horizons!

Continue reading →